Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Back
  3. Breast pathways (referral pathways)
  4. Gynaecomastia
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Gynaecomastia

Warning

The Gynaecomastia Pathway includes recommendations for management in primary care and in the breast unit.

Click the play button below to find out more about about breast lesions in men.

 

Background

The Symptomatic Breast Speciality Delivery Group was established to support and look at new innovative ways to delivering Symptomatic Breast services across NHS Scotland.

Through development of Once for Scotland approaches for delivery of care, focus is being placed on looking at opportunities to develop clinical pathways to reduce unwarranted variation in delivery of quality healthcare and to sustainably improve waiting times for non-urgent care within breast services.

Speciality Delivery Groups have been established to engage and fully utilise the role of clinical leadership across NHS Scotland.

Development of the Gynaecomastia Pathway has been progressed through the Symptomatic Breast Speciality Delivery Group.

The recommendations have not followed the standard process used by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) but are based on available guidance and expert opinion, with peer review to provide quality assurance.

This guidance will be reviewed and updated as new evidence emerges.

 

Definition

Gynaecomastia is a benign enlargement of the male breast with firm tissue extending concentrically beyond the nipple. It may unilateral, bi-lateral, painful or asymptomatic4.

 

Consensus

A common theme during the Breast Speciality Delivery group meetings has focused on the referral of men with breast issues to secondary care services.

A consensus was formed around the principles that:

  1. Gynaecomastia is a breast manifestation of a systemic problem. Secondary care referral and investigation is not necessary in the vast majority of cases and variation in practice and over investigation are common.
  2. Breast lumps in men (rather than generalised swelling of the breast tissue) require specific investigation.

 

Pathway recommendations 1. Management in primary care

a.   Examination should distinguish between general swelling of the breast tissue or a specific lump. Swelling of breast tissue due to gynaecomastia is often asymmetrical. A soft, well-defined lump away from the breast tissue is likely to be a lipoma and may not require further investigation, especially if other lipomas are present. A specific lump within the breast tissue (rather than generalised breast swelling) or other features of concern (such as nipple inversion, nipple discharge or distortion) requires referral to the breast unit.

b.   A history should be taken for causes of gynaecomastia, including drugs (prescribed or otherwise), alcohol, protein supplements, liver disease, testicular issues and obesity (see Systemic conditions associated with gynaecomastia). In those going through puberty or the very old, gynaecomastia is likely to be due to normal, age-related hormonal changes. Drugs causing gynaecomastia include antioestrogens, spironolactone, calcium channel blockers, proton pump inhibitors, cimetidine, allopurinol, digoxin, opioids, anabolic steroids and cannabis. The use of protein supplements also appears to be associated. Testicular examination should be performed for atrophy, absence or lump. If any predisposing cause is identified this should be addressed. Gynaecomastia is likely to persist or recur after treatment if the underlying cause is still present. Pubertal gynaecomastia will usually resolve spontaneously but can take many months.

c.   In the absence of a predisposing cause, consider blood tests for urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, Luteinizing hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone testosterone, prolactin, beta human chorionic gonadotropin- and alpha-fetoprotein and thyroid function tests and address any abnormalities.

d.   Consider medical treatment for persisting pubertal gynaecomastia or where there is no obvious predisposing cause or abnormality of blood tests. This is an unlicensed indication. It is most useful for recent onset gynaecomastia and usually improves breast sensitivity. If prescription of a medication out with it's licensed indication is being considered discussion with secondary care colleagues is an option should this be felt necessary for the small number of patients who may benefit.

  • Tamoxifen 10mg once daily for 3-9 months
  • Anastrozole 1mg daily for 3 months

e.   Surgical excision for cosmesis is considered through the exceptional aesthetic referral pathway.

 

Pathway recommendations 2. Management in the breast unit

  1. Those with a breast lump (not just generalised breast swelling) should undergo triple assessment. Those with a clinically obvious lipoma may not need further investigation.
  2. Investigation and treatment pathways are otherwise as noted above for primary care.
  3. When an obvious cause of gynecomastia is present, further investigation is not necessary.
  4. Consider mammography in those over 40. Ultrasound scanning is not required unless a specific breast lump (not just generalised breast swelling or a lipoma) is present.

 

Systemic conditions associated with gynaecomastia

  • Testicular failure
  • Liver disease
  • Obesity
  • Renal failure
  • Adrenal disease
  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Testicular cancer
  • Lung cancer
  • Klinefelter’s syndrome

 

References

  1. Association of Breast Surgery (2021) Investigation and management of gynaecomastia in primary and secondary care Last accessed 22 August 2023
  2. Royal College or Radiologists (2019) Guidance on screening and symptomatic breast imaging, Fourth edition Last accessed 22 August 2023
  3. Thiruchelvam P, Churchill W, Walker JN, Rose K, Lewis J, Al-Mufti R. Gynaecomastia. BMJ 016;354:i4833 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4833
  4. Niewoehner, CB. Gynaecomastia. BMJ Best Practice. Oct 2022. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/869 Last accessed 22 August 2023

 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 09/08/2023

Next review date: 10/02/2025

Author(s): Symptomatic Breast Speciality Delivery Group.

Approved By: Centre for Sustainable Delivery