Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Back
  3. Dermatology pathways
  4. Basal Cell Carcinoma
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Basal Cell Carcinoma

Warning

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer. It is believed that BCCs arise from pluripotential cells in the basal layer of the epidermis or the infundibulum of the hair follicle. BCCs typically occur in areas of chronic sun exposure and present as slowly enlarging reddish pearly patch, papule, or nodule commonly, but not exclusively, on the head and neck. The low-risk superficial variant is often located on the trunk. BCCs frequently ulcerate and become crusted. BCCs are slow growing, often increasing by 2-3mm a year. Although they rarely metastasise, they can cause significant local destruction and disfigurement if neglected or inadequately treated, particularly if of the sclerosing or infiltrative subtype. 

Treatment/ therapy

Low risk BCCs management: Patient (>24 years) has a BCC less than or equal to 1cm below the clavicle, and is of the superficial or nodulocystic histology, and is not overlying important anatomical structures (e.g. major vessels), and the patient is not immunosuppressed, and does not have Gorlin’s syndrome. 

Lesions should be biopsied if there is uncertainty regarding the diagnosis, if not, they must be closely followed-up and referred if not improved by treatment. 

 

For superficial BCCs (sBCC) 

Prescribe: 

  • Topical fluorouracil 5% cream (Efudix) 

1 cm margin around the lesion twice daily, for 4 weeks.   

Alternatively; 

Prescribe: 

  • Imiquimod (Aldara 5% cream) once daily, 5 times a week, for 6 weeks. 

 

Consider surgery for sBCC and some nodular BCCs at low risk sites

Low/ intermediate risk BCCs management: Patient (>24 years) has a BCC less than 1 cm above the clavicle and is of the Superficial or nodulocystic histology; Patient has a BCC greater than or equal to 2cm below the clavicle and is of the Superficial or nodulocystic histology; Patient is not immunosuppressed, does not have Gorlin’s syndrome. 

Nodulocystic BCCs of greater than 1cm above the clavicle and greater than 2cm below it should be treated with a complete excision by an accredited skin surgeon, with 4mm surgical margins.  

 

Nodulocystic BCCs 1 cm at low-risk sites can be treated with curettage and cautery (with sufficient passes).  If the histopathology shows any high-risk features, then a formal excision by an accredited skin surgeon in an approved site is advised.  

High risk BCCs management: Patient (>24 years) has a BCC greater than or equal to 1cm on their facial areas (nose, lips, periorbital) and is of a high-risk (Infiltrative, micronodular, basosquamous) Histological type; Patient is immunocompromised or has a genetic predisposition e.g. Gorlin’s syndrome. 

High risk BCCs as mentioned above regardless of size should be referred as an urgent referral 

 

Note that infiltrative BCCs can be difficult to diagnose. To aid diagnosis, stretching out the lesion or using an alcohol wipe may reveal the typical pearly features. 

 

Dermoscopy can show the sharply focused telangiectasia. Consider a shave biopsy to confirm.   

Referral Management

Low risk BCCs management: Patient (>24 years) has a BCC less than or equal to 1cm below the clavicle, and is of the superficial or nodulocystic histology, and is not overlying important anatomical structures (e.g. major vessels), and the patient is not immunosuppressed, and does not have Gorlin’s syndrome. 

Manage in secondary care. Surgery can be considered by GPs with available skills in some low-risk situations. 

  • A simple guide is 1 cm below clavicle [but excluding hands, nail units, genitals, pretibial, ankles and feet] 
  • For further detail on low risk sites see BAD guidelines for management of BCCs 

Low/ intermediate risk BCCs management: Patient (>24 years) has a BCC less than 1 cm above the clavicle and is of the Superficial or nodulocystic histology; Patient has a BCC greater than or equal to 2cm below the clavicle and is of the Superficial or nodulocystic histology; Patient is not immunosuppressed, does not have Gorlin’s syndrome. 

Manage in secondary care. 

  • ≥ 2 cm Below clavicle [but excluding hands, nail units, genitals, pretibia, ankles and feet] 
  • <1 cm on the face, excluding nasolabial sites (central face, eyebrows, periorbital, nose, lips (cutaneous and vermilion), chin, mandible, preauricular, postauricular, temple, ears nose, forehead, ears, neck) 

High risk BCCs management: Patient (>24 years) has a BCC greater than or equal to 1cm on their facial areas (nose, lips, periorbital) and is of a high-risk (Infiltrative, micronodular, basosquamous) Histological type; Patient is immunocompromised or has a genetic predisposition e.g. Gorlin’s syndrome. 

Manage in secondary care.  

  • All basal cell lesions ≥1 cm on face and ≥2 cm below clavicle.  
  • Cases with high-risk histopathology may need discussion within a skin cancer MDT  

Clinical tips

  • Suspect BCC in lesions which have intermittent spontaneous bleeding. 
  • If topical treatment provokes excess inflammation consider moderate potency steroid for up to 10 days. 
  • Patients prescribed Efudix or Imiquimod should be followed up (3-6 months) after completion of treatment.   
  • All non-face to face consultations or requests for advice should have an accompanying photograph and ideally a dermoscopy image if possible. 
  • BCCs occur in all skin types. Patients who have had a BCC are prone to developing further skin cancer (estimated clinical risk of 50% over 5 years)  
  • Incomplete excisions at high-risk sites can lead to complex and high morbidity recurrence.  
  • Once a person develops basal cell carcinoma, they have commenced a chronic disposition to UV-pathology and should consider sun protection and self-examination for potential skin cancers.  

ICD search categories

Malignant 

ICD11 code - 2C32 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 24/05/2023

Next review date: 24/05/2025

Author(s): Adapted from the BAD Referral Guidelines.

Version: BAD 1

Co-Author(s): Publisher: Centre for Sustainable Delivery, Scottish Dermatological Society.

Approved By: Scottish Dermatological Society