Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Back
  3. Dermatology pathways
  4. Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Squamous cell carcinoma: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) often appears as a firm pink lump with a rough or hyperkeratotic surface. There can be a lot of surface scale and sometimes even a spiky horn sticking up from the surface. The lump often feels tender when touched, bleeds easily and may develop into an ulcer. SCCs grow significantly quicker than BCCs (visible change over weeks rather than months). SCC predominantly arise on sun-exposed sites and there are often other signs of sun-damaged skin. 

The most commonly affected areas are the backs of hands and forearms, upper part of the face and, especially in males, the scalp, lower lip and pinna. For both SCC and BCC there can sometimes be considerable skin damage if the tumour is not treated. Approximately 25,000 squamous cell carcinomas of the skin are diagnosed each year. A full time GP is likely to diagnose at least one person with squamous cell carcinoma every 1–2 years. Death from squamous cell carcinoma is rare (<5%). The main advantage of early diagnosis is less extensive treatment. 

Treatment/ therapy

Low-risk: Factors relating to low-risk tumours - Diameter <2cm; Slow growing with a keratotic surface and regular features

 Refer via urgent suspicion of cancer (USOC) 

High-risk - Factors relating to high-risk tumours: Diameter 2-4cm; Rapidly growing with less keratin production and irregular features; Location on ear or lip; Tumour arising within scar or area of chronic inflammation; Immunosuppression 

Refer via USOC 

Very High-risk - Factors relating to very high-risk tumours: Diameter >4cm; Organ transplant recipients; Haematological malignancies

Refer via USOC 

Referral Management

Low-risk: Factors relating to low-risk tumours - Diameter <2cm; Slow growing with a keratotic surface and regular features

If alternative diagnoses (actinic keratosis or Bowen’s) have been suspected and treated surgically or non-surgically (topical therapies/cryotherapy), suspicions should be raised for possible SCC if there has been no response to these therapies within 3 months. 

Clinical resources

TNM Staging System - Basal and Squamous Cell Skin Cancer Stages (cancer.org) see also Cancer Research UK 

BAD SCC guidelines 2020 

NICE CKS – skin cancers – recognition and referral 

Patient.Info Doctors- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Skin 

PCDS- Squamous Cell Carcinoma 

DermNet NZ- Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma 

Clinical tips

  • SCC predominantly arise in older patients, although immunosuppressed patients and the other high-risk groups e.g., xeroderma pigmentosum, can develop lesions at a much younger age 
  • Lesions may start de-novo or from pre-existing pre-cancerous skin lesions such as AK and Bowen's disease 
  • Transformation can also occur in areas of chronic inflammation such as leg ulcers 
  • Ulceration and granulation tissue more common than scale in poorly differentiated SCCs 
  • Pain/tenderness on palpation supports a diagnosis of SCC 
  • Can be difficult to distinguish from BCC. The latter can have diagnostic features of pearliness and telangiectasia and is more likely to have a history of spontaneous bleeding.  
  • SCCs increase in size significantly over several weeks; BCCs increase in size significantly over months 
  • SCC can be distinguished from AK and Bowen’s by looking for induration (thickening) beneath overlying keratin. When there is doubt lesions should be referred to secondary care.   
  • Beware of diagnosing a pyogenic granuloma in an elderly patient as this could be SCC or amelanotic melanoma 
  • Overlying scale/crust should be removed during clinical assessment where possible – to assess induration (suggestive of SCC)  
  • Have a higher index of suspicion/lower threshold for referral in immunocompromised patients, particularly transplant patients.

Patient information resources

  1. BAD Patient Information Leaflet - SCC 
  2. NHS page on non-melanoma skin cancers 
  3. DermnetNZ Patient Information Leaflet - SCC 
  4. NHS Inform Scotland- Skin Cancer (non-melanoma) 

ICD search categories

Malignant 

ICD11 code - 2C31 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 23/05/2023

Next review date: 23/05/2025

Author(s): Adapted from the BAD Referral Guidelines.

Version: BAD 1

Co-Author(s): Publisher: Centre for Sustainable Delivery, Scottish Dermatological Society.

Approved By: Scottish Dermatological Society