Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Scottish Palliative Care Guidelines
  3. Back
  4. Medicine information
  5. Methadone
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Methadone

Red – For medicines normally initiated and used under specialist guidance

Introduction

The information below is intended as a guide for use in primary and secondary care to support the management of patients receiving methadone as a third-line analgesic for complex pain. 

Methadone should only be started by a consultant in palliative medicine and patients require ongoing specialist supervision.  

 

Description

Methadone is a potent, synthetic opioid. Methadone has complex pharmacokinetics and a long half-life. There is a risk of accumulation, especially in elderly patients.

Preparations

Tables are best viewed in landscape mode on mobile devices

Oral

Methadone tablets

Methadone liquid

5mg (preferred form)

1mg/ml (green)

10mg/ml (blue)

Injection

Methadone injection

10mg/ml (1ml, 2ml, 3.5ml, 5ml ampoules)

 

Indications

Methadone is only used as a third-line opioid for patients with complex pain that is poorly responsive to other opioids, or where these opioids have resulted in intolerable side effects.

  • Patient has responded poorly or had intolerable side effects from first and second-line opioids (for example morphine, diamorphine, oxycodone, fentanyl).
  • In complex neuropathic pain: if the patient has not responded to first and second-line opioid and adjuvant analgesic combinations.
  • In end-stage chronic kidney disease (eGFR less than 30ml/min).

Adjuvant methadone may also be used for the above indications under specialist supervision.

 

Cautions

Methadone should always be used with caution but particularly in the following situations.

  • Methadone has a long and unpredictable half-life which can lead to side effects/severe opioid toxicity without a change in the regular dose, particularly when methadone is started for the first time – careful monitoring is needed.
  • Patients with incident pain or unstable pain where repeated doses of methadone may accumulate and cause opioid toxicity.
  • Pain suspected to have a strong psychological component as repeated demands for as needed doses of methadone may lead to opioid toxicity.

 

Drug interactions:

  • Hepatic methadone metabolism varies considerably between individuals and this variability is responsible for the large differences in methadone clearance and the doses needed to manage pain. 
  • QTMethadone levels may increase if given with fluoxetine, sertraline, clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole. Methadone should not be given with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (for example phenelzine and linezolid) or within 2 weeks of stopping them.
  • Methadone levels may decrease if given with phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, St John’s Wort.
  • Concurrent administration with medications that affect methadone metabolism via the hepatic cytochrome P450 system (CYP3A4) – refer to British National Formulary (BNF). Methadone can cause QT prolongation – caution with other drugs that may have this effect, for example QTclarithromycin, amitriptyline, QTcitalopram, QTdomperidone, prochlorperazine, QThaloperidol, QTamiodarone. Refer to BNF.

 

Liver impairment: Reduced clearance. Dose reduction may be necessary.

Renal impairment: No dose reduction necessary. Not significantly removed by dialysis.

 

Side effects

  • Patient may become unexpectedly drowsy or develop respiratory depression particularly when first starting methadone – refer to cautions above.
  • Side effects that are common to all opioids, including dry mouth, constipation may be less common.

 

Dose and administration

  • Patients starting methadone will usually require inpatient admission for 5 to 7 days. A stable methadone dose for 48 to 72 hours before discharge is needed.  
  • Methadone may occasionally be started safely as an adjuvant analgesic for selected patients in the community. The palliative care specialist will recommend an individual dosing regimen and discuss and review the management plan with the patient’s GP.
  • Methadone is usually given twice daily (occasionally three times daily). 
  • A shorter acting opioid than methadone is often used for breakthrough pain in patients on a stable methadone dose. 
  • The methadone dose and the timing of doses should not be changed without instructions from a palliative medicine specialist.

 

Discontinuing methadone: Seek specialist advice.

This may be needed if treatment is ineffective, the patient is experiencing side effects, is unable to take oral medication or is in the last days of life.

 

Practice points

  • Undertake an individual risk assessment prior to initiating methadone. Consider if drug diversion/misuse is likely and if weekly/twice weekly dispensing from a community pharmacy is required.
  • Discuss the methadone prescription with the GP and provide written information.
  • Ensure the GP is aware which methadone preparation should be prescribed if the patient is receiving methadone liquid.
  • Ensure the patient is reviewed by a member of the specialist palliative care team as soon as possible after discharge (within 2 to 3 days).
  • Discuss the prescription with community pharmacy and explain methadone has been prescribed for pain management not drug dependency.

 

References

Blackburn D. Methadone: the analgesic. European Journal of Palliative Care 2005;12:188-191.

Nicholson AB. Methadone for cancer pain. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2008;(4). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003971.pub3/pdf/standard

Prommer EE. Methadone for cancer pain. Palliative Care: Research & treatment 2010; 4(1-10).

Twycross R et al. Palliative Care Formulary (4th Ed). Palliativedrugs.com Ltd, Nottingham, 2011.

Acknowledgement: Brown DJF. Methadone for cancer pain: A reference for specialists. St Columba’s Hospice, Edinburgh, 2007.