Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Scottish Palliative Care Guidelines
  3. Back
  4. Medicine information
  5. Naloxone
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Naloxone

Green – For medicines routinely initiated and used by generalists

Introduction

Description: Antagonist for use in severe opioid induced respiratory depression.

Preparations

400 micrograms/ml injection (1ml ampoule)

 

Indications

  • Reversal of life-threatening respiratory depression due to opioid analgesics, indicated by:
    • a low respiratory rate, less then 8 respirations/minute
    • oxygen saturation below 85%, patient cyanosed.
  • If less severe opioid toxicity:
    • omit next regular dose of opioid; review analgesia.
    • monitor the patient closely; maintain hydration, oxygenation.

 

Cautions

  • Naloxone is not indicated for opioid-induced drowsiness and/or delirium that are not life threatening.
  • Naloxone is not indicated for patients on opioids who are dying.
  • Patients on regular opioids for pain and symptom control are physically dependent; naloxone given in too large a dose or too quickly can cause an acute withdrawal reaction and an abrupt return of pain that is difficult to control.
  • Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease are at more risk of side effects.

 

Side effects

Total antagonism will result in severe pain with hyperalgesia and, if physically dependent, severe physical withdrawal symptoms and marked agitation. Opioid withdrawal syndrome: anxiety, irritability, muscle aches; nausea and vomiting; can include life-threatening tachycardia and hypertension. Cardiac arrhythmias, pulmonary oedema and cardiac arrest have been described.

 

Dose and administration

Where intravenous administration possible:

Small doses of naloxone by slow intravenous (IV) injection improve respiratory status without completely blocking the opioid analgesia. Onset of action of intravenous naloxone is 1 to 2 minutes.

  • Stop the opioid.
  • High flow oxygen, if hypoxic.
  • Dilute 400 micrograms naloxone (1 ampoule) to 10ml with sodium chloride 0.9% injection in a 10ml syringe. Refer to prolonged, or recurrent, opioid-induced respiratory depression section below.
  • Administer a small dose of 80 micrograms (2ml of diluted naloxone) as a slow IV bolus every 2 minutes until the patient’s respiratory status is satisfactory (>8 respirations/minute).
  • Flush the cannula with sodium chloride 0.9% between the naloxone doses.
  • Patients usually respond after 2ml to 4ml of diluted naloxone (=80 micrograms to 160 micrograms) with deeper breathing and an improved conscious level.
  • A few patients need 1mg to 2mg of naloxone (this requires between 3 and 5 ampoules). If there is little or no response, consider other causes (for example other sedatives, an intracranial event, acute sepsis, acute renal failure causing opioid accumulation).

Closely monitor respiratory rate and oxygen saturation. Further doses may be needed. The duration of action of many opioids exceeds that of naloxone (15 to 90 minutes) and impaired liver or renal function will slow clearance of the opioid. Opioid depressant effects may return as the effects of naloxone diminish, and additional naloxone doses (or a continuous IV infusion) may be required.

Note: There is wide variation in the recommended initial bolus dose of naloxone reported in the literature from 20 micrograms (American Pain Scociety 2008) to 100 micrograms (PCF-4).

 

Prolonged, or recurrent, opioid-induced respiratory depression:

  • If repeated naloxone doses are required, start a continuous IV infusion of naloxone via an adjustable infusion pump.
    • Add 1mg of naloxone (= 2.5ml of 400 micrograms/ml naloxone injection) to 100ml of sodium chloride 0.9% to give a concentration of 10 micrograms/ml.
    • Calculate the dose requirement per hour by totalling the naloxone bolus doses and dividing by the time period over which all the doses have been given.
    • Start the IV infusion of naloxone at half this calculated hourly rate.
    • Adjust the naloxone infusion rate to keep the respiratory rate above 8 (do not titrate to the level of consciousness).
    • Continue to monitor the patient closely.
    • Continue the infusion until the patient’s condition has stabilised.
  • Additional IV boluses may need to be given using naloxone diluted in sodium chloride 0.9%. Refer to dose & administration section above.
  • Administration should be accompanied by other resuscitative measures such as administration of oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or artificial respiration.

If in doubt, seek advice.

  • Seek and treat the precipitating cause(s) of the opioid toxicity.
  • Review the regular analgesic prescriptions.

 

Care settings where there is no immediate access to the IV route, for example community:

  • Naloxone may be administered intramuscular (IM) when IV access is not immediately available.
  • Onset of naloxone IM is 2 to 5 minutes.
  • 100 micrograms (0.25ml) naloxone IM should be given and repeated after five minutes if there is no improvement with the first dose.
  • An IV line should be sited as soon as possible.

 

Practice points

  • Naloxone should be available in all clinical areas where opioids are used (National Patient Safety Agency).
  • Naloxone is also available in disposable, pre-filled syringes. These doses may be too high for patients on regular opioid analgesics.
  • Reversal of buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression may be incomplete. Larger naloxone doses may be needed. 

 

References

Twycross R, Wilcock A. Palliative Care Formulary PCF4+ (4th edition) 2011.

National Patient Safety Agency. Safer practice notice 2006/12.

Adult Emergencies Handbook. NHS Lothian: University Hospitals Division.

Electronic Medicines Compendium. www.medicines.org.uk/naloxone accessed at http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/21095/SPC/Naloxone+400+micrograms+ml+solution+for+Injection+(hameln)/

Miaskowski C et al. (2008) Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain (6e). American Pain Society, Skokie, Illinois, p. 31.

The American Heart Association. Guidelines 2005 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2005; 112(Suppl I).

Mercadante.(2003)  Naloxone in treating central adverse effects during opioid titration for cancer pain. Journal of pain and symptom management:vol:26 iss:2 691 -693.

Manfredi P, Ribeiro S, Chandler S, et al. Inappropriate use of naloxone in cancer patients with pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1996;11:131–134.