Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Scottish Palliative Care Guidelines
  3. Back
  4. Symptom control
  5. Anticipatory prescribing
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: April 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for April 2024. 

Issues with RDS and Umbraco access

Tactuum has been working hard to address the issues experienced during the last week. They have identified a series of three mitigation measures and put the first of these in place on Friday 3rd May.  If this does not resolve the problems, the second mitigation will be actioned, and then the third if necessary.

Please keep a lookout for any slowing down of the system or getting locked out. Please email myself, mbuchner@tactuum.com and onivarova@tactuum.com if you experience any problems, and also please raise an urgent support ticket via the Support Portal.

Thank you for your patience and understanding while we achieve a full resolution.

Promotion and communication resources

A rotating carousel presenting some of the key RDS tools and capabilities, and an editable slideset, are now available in the Resources for RDS providers section of the Learning and Support toolkit.

Redesign and improvements to RDS

The redesign of RDS Search and Browse is still on-track for delivery by mid-June 2024. We then plan to have a 3-week user acceptance testing phase before release to live. All editors and toolkit owners on this mailing list will be invited to participate in the UAT.

The archiving and version control functionality is also progressing well and we will advise on timescales for user acceptance testing shortly.

Tactuum is also progressing with the deep linking to individual toolkits within the mobile RDS app. There are several unknowns around the time and effort required for this work, which will only become clear as the work progresses. So we need to be careful to protect budget for this purpose.

New feature requests

These have all been compiled and effort estimated. Once the redesign work is complete, these will be prioritised in line with the remaining budget. We expect this to take place around late June.

Evaluation

Many thanks to those of you completed the value and impact survey we distributed in February. Here are some key findings from the 65 responses we received.

Figure 1: Impact of RDS on direct delivery of care

Key figures

  • 93% say that RDS has improved evidence-informed practice (high impact 62%; some impact 31%)
  • 91% report that RDS has improved consistency in practice (high impact 65%, some impact 26%)
  • 85% say that RDS has improved patient safety (high impact 59%, some impact 26%)
  • Although shared decision-making tools are only a recent addition to RDS, and only represent a small proportion of the current toolset, 85% of respondents still said that RDS had delivered impact in this area (53% high impact, 32% some impact.) 92% anticipate that RDS will deliver impact on shared decision-making in future and 85% believe it will improve delivery of personalised care in future.

Figure 2 shows RDS impact to date on delivery of health and care services

 

Key figures

These data show how RDS is already contributing to NHS reform priorities and supporting delivery of more sustainable care.

Saving time and money

  • RDS clearly has a strong impact on saving practitioner time, with 90% of respondents reporting that this is the case. 65% say it has a high impact; 25% say it has some impact on time-saving.
  • It supports devolved decision-making across the multi-professional team (85% of respondents)
  • 76% of respondents confirm that it saves money compared, for example, to investing in commercial apps (54% high impact; 22% some impact.)
  • 72% believe it has impacted already on saving money and reducing waste in the way services are delivered – e.g. reducing costs of referral management, prescribing, admissions.

Quality assurance and governance

  • RDS leads are clear that RDS has improved local governance of guidelines, with 87% confirming that this is the case. (62% high impact; 25% some impact.)

Service innovation and workforce development

  • RDS is a major driver for service innovation and improvement (83% of respondents) and has impacted significantly on workforce knowledge and skills (92% of respondents – 66% high impact; 26% some impact).

New toolkits

A few examples of toolkits published to live in the last month:

Toolkits in development

Some of the toolkits the RDS team is currently working on:

  • SARCS (Sexual Assault Response Coordination Service)
  • Staffing method framework – Care Inspectorate.
  • SIGN 171 - Diabetes in pregnancy
  • SIGN 158 – British Guideline on Management of Asthma. Selected sections will be incorporated into the RDS, and complemented by a new chronic asthma pathway being developed by SIGN, British Thoracic Society and NICE.
  • Clinical pathways from NHS Fife and NHS Lanarkshire

Please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot if you would like to learn more about a toolkit. The RDS team will put you in touch with the relevant toolkit lead.

Quality audit of RDS toolkits

Thanks to all of you who have responded to the retrospective quality audit survey and to the follow up questions.  We still have some following up to do, and to work with owners of a further 23 toolkits to complete responses. An interim report is being presented to the HIS Quality and Performance Committee.

Implementation projects

Eight clinical services and two public library services are undertaking tests of change to implement the Being a partner in my care app. This app aims to support patients and the public to become active participants in Realistic Medicine. It has a strong focus on personalised, person-centred care and a library of shared decision aids, as well as simple explanations and videoclips to help the public to understand the aims of Realistic Medicine.  The tests of change will inform guidance and an implementation model around wider adoption and spread of the app.

With kind regards

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Anticipatory prescribing

Introduction

If a patient is in the last weeks or days of life it is helpful if ‘just in case’ (JIC) anticipatory medication for end of life symptom control is available so they can be given if required without unnecessary delay. JIC prescribing includes the most important medicines which might be required to manage predictable and distressing symptoms, or in the event that the patient cannot manage necessary oral medications.

If significant bleeding can be anticipated, it is usually best to discuss the possibility with the patient and their family. Ensure carers at home have an emergency contact number and an anticipatory care plan is in place and all professionals and services involved are aware of the care plan, including out-of-hours services
(refer to Out of hours handover guideline). Refer to Bleeding guideline for full anticipatory preparation actions and post event management.

It is appropriate to use this guidance to prescribe anticipatory medicines for patients in all settings. Particular care may be required in secure (prison) environments.  Alternative arrangements may be required in remote and rural locations taking into account ease of access to professional support.

 

Practicalities in community settings

  • The prescriber must complete a community medication administration chart before nurses in the community can administer medicines.  This should include the dose, route, frequency, indication(s), limits, and when to seek advice.
  • Community nurses or pharmacists supply a container (JIC box), syringes and sharps disposal container. The community pharmacy supply the medicines following individual prescriptions.
  • The decision to prescribe medication for use in the future should always be based on a risk/benefit analysis. Reasons for not providing anticipatory medicines include risk of drug diversion or misuse.
  • It is good practice to issue separate prescriptions for urgently required medicines so they can be dispensed at different pharmacies if needed.
  • Read the Last days of life guideline.

 

Management

Anticipatory medication

  • If a patient is currently receiving subcutaneous (SC) analgesics, anxiolytic/sedatives, anti‑emetics, or anti-psychotics, an additional anticipatory medication supply may not be needed. Check what medicines are already available in the patient’s home before prescribing new anticipatory medication.
  • If a patient is already prescribed an oral medication for symptom control and this is effective, the same medication may be suitable for prescribing by the subcutaneous route for the JIC box.
  • Morphine is the first-line opioid of choice, however some NHS boards may use diamorphine first line. The dose stated below is for an opioid naïve patient.
  • If the patient is taking a regular oral opioid, an SC breakthrough dose of the same opioid should be prescribed for the JIC box. SC dose would usually be half of oral dose. The breakthrough dose should be calculated as 1/6th to 1/10th of the 24 hour opioid dose.
  • Refer to the Choosing and changing opioids guideline.
  • Attention should be paid to renal function.
  • If the patient has stage 4/5 chronic kidney disease or severe renal impairment (eGFR <30ml/min), specialists may recommend use of alfentanil SC. Refer to the Renal disease in the last days of life guideline.

The medications available in the JIC box are prescribed for specific symptoms and for specific doses. These medications can in some circumstances be used for other symptoms, such as severe agitation, at higher doses. Clear instructions for the medication administration for the new symptom must be prescribed in the community medication administration chart, including dose, route of administration, frequency, indication(s), limits and when to seek advice.

 

Anticipatory prescription

  • The prescription should include the four medications that might be required for end of life symptom control, plus diluent
  • Note: It is important that prescription wording for controlled drugs meets the legal requirements to reduce delays in dispensing
  • Refer to Sample CD prescription.

 

Review

  • It is essential to review the effect of any ‘as required’ medicine prescribed in an anticipatory fashion, after it has been administered. This will help to direct a review of the overall treatment plan.
  • There should be a review of the treatment plan within one hour to assess if the administered medication has:
    • had the desired effect
    • had no effect on the symptom
    • a partial, but inadequate, effect on the symptom.
  • In each of these situations, a comprehensive review of symptoms, drug doses and alternative therapeutic options must be undertaken.
  • There should be a review of the treatment plan within 24 hours when the administered medication:
    • is effective for an appropriate and expected time
    • has had a limited duration of effectiveness that has necessitated three or more repeated doses.
  • As part of the review, the doses of regular medication, such as modified release tablets, transdermal patches or those given by syringe pump, should be considered. If there are signs of toxicity, a dose reduction, or drug switch, may be required. Advice from specialist palliative care should be sought if needed.

 

Opioid for pain and/or breathlessness (for opioid naive patient)

  • Morphine sulfate injection (10mg/ml ampoules)
  • Dose: 2mg to 5mg SC, repeated at up to hourly intervals as needed for pain or breathlessness
  • Refer to Sample CD prescription.
  • If 3 or more doses have been given within 4 hours with little or no benefit
    seek urgent advice or review
  • If more than 6 doses are required in 24 hours seek advice or review
  • Supply ten (10) 1ml ampoules*
  • Note: Some NHS boards may use diamorphine

 

 *some Health Boards may recommend smaller quantities as appropriate

Anxiolytic sedative for anxiety or agitation or breathlessness

  • Midazolam injection (10mg in 2ml ampoules)
  • Dose: 2mg to 5mg SC, repeated at hourly intervals as needed for anxiety/distress
  • If 3 or more doses have been given within 4 hours with little or no benefit seek urgent advice or review
  • If more than 6 doses are required in 24 hours seek advice or review
  • Supply ten (10) ampoules of 2ml*
  • Midazolam can be used in massive terminal haemorrhage (refer to Bleeding guideline)
  • Note: if the patient is already on large background doses of benzodiazepines, a larger dose may be needed (if they are frail, a smaller dose may be sufficient)
  • Levomepromazine can be used in terminal agitation or agitated delirium under specialist advice at a different dose (refer to Care in the last days of life guideline)

 

 *some Health Boards may recommend smaller quantities as appropriate

Anti-secretory for thin, upper respiratory secretions

  • Hyoscine butylbromide injection (Buscopan®) (20mg/ml ampoules)
  • Dose: 20mg SC, repeated at up to hourly intervals as needed for thin upper respiratory secretions
  • Maximum of 120mg in 24 hours. Supply 10 ampoules*.

 

 *some Health Boards may recommend smaller quantities as appropriate

Anti-emetic for nausea and vomiting

  • QTlevomepromazine injection (25mg/ml ampoules) Dose: 2.5mg to 5mg SC, 12 hourly as needed for nausea.
  • May need to be given more frequently initially, for example up to hourly, to control symptoms.
  • If 3 or more doses have been given within 4 hours with little or no benefit seek urgent advice or review.
  • If more than 6 doses are required in 24 hours seek advice or review.
  • Supply 10 ampoules*
  • Levomepromazine can be used in terminal agitation or agitated delirium under specialist advice at a different dose (refer to Care in the last days of life guideline)

 

 *some Health Boards may recommend smaller quantities as appropriate